A STUDY GUIDE FOR THE HAMMER OF GOD BY BO GIERTZ

AUTHOR: BISHOP BO GIERTZ
Bo Giertz (1905-1998) served for many years as Bishop of the diocese of Gothenburg in the Lutheran Church of Sweden. Bishop Giertz was known for his sturdy confessional Lutheran theology. He is remembered for his defense the orthodox Christian faith against the inroads of liberalism. He would not yield to the pressures to abandon apostolic practice by ordaining women into the pastoral office. In addition to The Hammer of God, Giertz was the author of several books now translated into English: Liturgy and Spiritual Awakening, Preaching From the Whole Bible, The Message for the Church in a Time of Crisis,With My Own Eyes: A Life of Jesus, and Freedom in Christ. A Memoriam published in Lutheran Forum commemorates his service to Christ's church: "The life of Bo Giertz spanned most of this century, at the midpoint of which he was consecrated bishop. His preaching, teaching, and writing demonstrated his utmost concern for God's Word and the people to whom it was addressed. He held firmly to the threefold heritage of the apostolic and patristic witness to the faith, the reformation confession of the faith, and the spiritual renewal in the faith. Until the end of his 93 years, he remained a vigorous leader of orthodox Lutherans in Sweden" -"In Memoriam: Bo Giertz, Bishop and Confessor" by Ronald B.Bagnall and Glenn C.Stone, Lutheran Forum (Winter 1998), 12.

A dozen years before his death, Bishop Giertz penned "My Last Will and Testament" in which he noted "It is not without sadness that we look back on those happy years. In my dark moments I wonder if ever a church, which has been given such a rich inheritance, has been so careless about it. My old eyes have had time to see so much of what in the long run means a sickness unto death for the Church. I mean the doubt that possess a revelation, a truth-to say with the Scriptures- 'which was once for all delivered to the saints' (Jude 3). The truth that Christ is the Savior; that he is the way, the truth, and the life; that there is no other way to the Father; that Christ with his Spirit has led the Apostles into all truth, and given the church a foundation, which can never be changed. Heaven and earth will pass away. Everything else is submitted to the law of change, but his Word will remain-and it is for us to hold on to that, steadfast to the end. This faith is on a collision course with some of the pet dogmas of our time: the belief that everything is relative, that everything is continually changing, which at the same time means progress, even in new concepts of faith and altered codes of morality"- "My Last Will and Testament" by Bo Giertz, The Lutheran Forum (Winter 1998), 13.

BACKGROUND
The Hammer of God is a historical/theological novel that demonstrates the power of God's Word over spiritual deadness, rationalism, pietism, and liberalism. The title of the book is based on Jeremiah 23:29, "Is not my word like a fire? Says the Lord. And like a hammer that breaks the rock into pieces?"

As you read this book keep in mind the historical background. Set within the parish of Odesjo over a period that reaches from the late 18th century to the middle of the 20th century, The Hammer of God demonstrates the constancy of the Gospel over against the the rationalism of the Enlightenment, the subjectivity of Pietism, and the relativism of Liberalism.Good descriptions of these movements can be found in Bengt Hagglund's History of Theology (325-397). You may also wish to read my 1998 Pieper Lecture entitled "Liturgy and Pietism: Then and Now." This essay is currently available under "Writings" on the University Lutheran Chapel website (http://www.tc.umn.edu/~lsf).

The founding father of Pietism was the German Lutheran pastor Phillip Jakob Spener (1635-1705). Spener sought to maintain the substance of orthodox Lutheran doctrine while presenting it in a new way. In his book, Pia desideria (1675), Spener set forth several proposals for transforming church life centering on the use of small groups called conventicles as the setting for the nuture of the spiritual life. There is a shift away from the means of grace to the spiritual experience of the believer. Assurance of salvation was to be found in one's personal experience of Christ. Pietism was less interested in the Office of the Holy Ministry than it was in the "Priesthood of All Believers." Doctrine was less important than living a pious life. Justification was displaced by an emphasis on sanctification.

The age of the Enlightenment roughly coincided with the 18th century. The roots of the Enlightenment are found in the humanism of the Renaissance. Prior to the Enlightenment, God was considered the central reality. With the Enlightenment, man becomes the central reality. No longer is philosopher considered the servant of philosophy. Deism replaced the orthodox Christian concept of God. Miracles were explained in a naturalistic manner. Books such as Matthew Tindal's Christianity as Old as Creation (1730) and Reimarus' Wolfenbuettel Fragments are prime examples of Enlightenment theology. Reason was set over revelation. Religion was increasingly viewed in individualistic terms. The promotion of good morals and happiness of human life were seen as the primary goals of Christianity.

The subjectivity of Pietism and the rationalism of the Enlightenment gave birth to Liberalism. Friedrich Schleiermacher (d.1834), a professor in Berlin, became the leading light of Liberalism. He attempted to describe religion as "the feeling of absolute dependence" on the infinite. Schleiermacher thought that true religion was not to be found in doctrinal formulations or acts of morality but in the spiritual consciousness of the individual. Liberalism divorced faith from history thus paving the way for a critical study of the Bible.

The names of several prominent church leaders surface several times in The Hammer of God. Carl Olof Rosenius (1816-1868) was a Lutheran lay preacher and spiritual leader. Troubled by doubt as a young man, he was led to certainty in his faith by George Scott, an English Methodist who was ministering in Stockholm. Rosenius was not a separatist; he urged his followers to remain faithful to the Church of Sweden and the teachings of Luther. Rosenius was one of the organizers of the National Evangelical Mission Society. He edited a magazine entitled Mission Tidings and authored a number of devotional books.

Henric Schartau (1757-1825) was a Swedish Lutheran churchman. Ordained in 1780, he was influenced by the German pietists but in 1787 he lost his enthusiasm for the conventicles (pietistic small group meetings) and turned his attention toward catechesis and the care of souls. Schartau served as the Dean of the Cathedral in Lund.

Johann Philip Fresenius (1705-1761) was a German Lutheran pietist. A pastor in several German cities, he also wrote a book of sermons, Evangelische Predigten which extended his influence into the Scandinavian countries as well.

Christian Scriver (1629-1693) was a German Lutheran pastor and writer of hymns and devotional materials. He was one of the first pietists. A gifted preacher and author, Scriver drew many of his illustrations from the world of nature. His sermons, devotional writings, and catechetical materials were widely used in Germany and Scandinavia.

Anders Nohrborg (1725-1767) was a Swedish Lutheran pastor and court chaplain. His sermons were published posthumously in a volume entitled The Order of Salvation for Fallen Mankind. He was referred to as "the preacher of the unseen congregation in Sweden." Nohrborg's sermon collection was popular exposition of Lutheran dogmatics. His sermons centered on justification by faith along and are devoid of appeals to human emotions. Nohrborg was influenced by pietism but avoided its excesses. He became one of the most widely known devotional writers in Sweden, although he died at an early age from tuberculosis.

Erik Pontoppidan (1698-1764) was a Danish-Norwegian Lutheran bishop. Educated at Aarhus, he became the court chaplain at Copenhagen. He later served as bishop in Bergen, Norway. His most famous book was an exposition of Luther's Catechism entitled Truth Unto Godliness. He was pietistic in his views.

Other books that provide good supplementary reading to The Hammer of God are:
Hagglund, Bengt. History of Theology
Preus, Daniel. Lutheranism and Pietism: 1998 Pieper Lectures
Preus, Herman. A Theology to Live By
Koerbele, Adolf. The Quest for Holiness
Sasse, Hermann. Here We Stand
Senkbeil, Harold. Sanctification: Christ in Action
Walther, C.F.W. The Proper Distinction of Law and Gospel

PART I "THE HAMMER OF GOD" (3-131)

1. Who was Savonius? What are his credentials (3ff)?




2. What assignment is given to Savonius? Why does he resent this task (8-9)?




3. How was a crisis provoked in Savonius? Did he find any help in his rationalistic training (11)?




4.How did Johannes' conscience accuse him (18)?




5. "Savonius could very well understand that one could doubt such things as the miracles and the sacraments, Adam, the fall into sin, and hell. But grace-nothing could be more obvious than that. Must not all who believe in the Most High God also acknowledge His goodness?" (20). What does Savonius assume about the grace of God? Why is this of no help to the dying man?



6. Who is Katrina? What does she tell Johannes that Pastor Savonius failed to tell him (28-29)?



7. Katrina says "You do not lack repentance, Johannes, but faith. You have walked the way of repentance for thirty years." (28) What was Katrina trying to get Johannes to see? How does Katrina use Scripture to direct the dying man away from his sin to Christ (28-31)?



8. What is the Pastor asked to do after Katrina is finished talking to Johannes (31ff)?



9. How was this episode beginning to impact Savonius (35ff)?


10. Why does Peter quote Luke 22:32 to Savonius (41-46)? How does the Pastor react?


11. What changes begin to take place in Savonius' preaching (51-55)?



12.What charges are leveled against Savonius (60)?



13. Who was Pastor Hafverman and why was he critical of Savonius (65-66)?




14.Why does the Dean tell Helvig that she must "trust Jesus and wear her mother's brooch" (69)?



15.How does the Dean confront Savonius with his growing legalism (86-88)?



16. How does the law preached by Savonius also accuse him (91-95)?



17.How did "the ancient words of the liturgy" bring comfort to Savonius' wounded heart (95)?




18.How does the episode with Anders show the beginning of another change in Savonius (106-112)?



19. What help is sent to Savonius in Linder (117-121)?



20. What was the Cathedral Chapter's verdict on Savonius (129-131)?





PART II "JESUS ONLY" (135-227)

1. Who was Fridfeldt (141)?



2. What does Fridfeldt conclude regarding the Rector (143)?



3. What does Fridfeldt mean when he says to the Rector "I am a believer" (146)? How does the Rector respond with the Gospel (147)? See Ephesians 2:8-10.



4.The Rector comments that there are "two different religions" (148). How does the following statement by Franz Pieper clarify this distinction: "(There are)…essentially two different religions: the religion of the Law, that is, the endeavor to reconcile God through man's own works, and the religion of the Gospel, that is, faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, belief wrought through the Gospel by the Holy Ghost that we have a gracious God through the reconciliation already effected by Christ and not because of our own works" (Christian Dogmatics I, 10).



5. How does the incident between Karl-August and Daniel illustrate the power of sin even in the lives of believers (158-167)? See Romans 7:14-25; I John 1:8-10.



6. How does the Rector deal with the dispute between Karl-August and Daniel? Does the Rector rightly distinguish Law and Gospel in his words with these two men (169-177)?




7. Why do the Rector's words, "One ought not talk about oneself, it may hid Jesus from view" sting in Fridfeldt's ears (179)?


8. What is meant by the statement made of Fridfeldt that "The crest of the revival had lifted him higher than was wholesome for an inexperienced Christian" (180)?




9.Fridefeldt received a letter from Conrad, a classmate at the university. What had happened to Conrad? Why had he allowed himself to be re-baptized (183-185)?



10.How did Conrad's letter provoke a spiritual crisis for Fridfeldt (185-191)?



11. Fridfeldt is called out to minister to Frans who had suffered a heart attack and is near death. When he arrives at the man's death bed what does he find? Why is Frans' daughter, Lena disturbed by her father (193-194)?



12. How did Fridfeldt see himself in this dying man (195-196)?



13. How does the crying baby remind Fridfeldt of the scope and power of original sin (197-199)? Note Article II of the Augsburg Confession: "…all men are full of evil lusts and inclinations from their mothers' wombs and are unable to have true fear of God and true faith in God (Tappert, 29). Also see Psalm 51:5.



14.Fridfeldt must leave the dying man to return to church for the Transfiguration Day Service. How did the Transfiguration Gospel (St.Matthew 17:1-8) change Fridfeldt (200-207)?




15. "He (Fridfeldt) never really cared for the liturgical altar service. It bothered him to be bound by a fixed ritual. It had therefore always been his practice to make little changes and additions, and to put as much feeling and personal touch into it as possible. Today he did not feel able to do this. Strangely enough, it was a relief to be allowed to read them as they were, ancient and hallowed words that fell as heavy, life-giving drops on his heart" (201). What was the liturgy doing to Fridfeldt?



16. How did Fridfeldt preach "Jesus only" in his Transfiguration Day sermon (202-206)? How was the atonement the basis for his preaching (204-205)?




17. Why was the housekeeper, Mrs.Holleman, critical of Fridfeldt's sermon (208)?



18. How does Fridfeldt unwittingly defend the liturgy of the church (208-209)?



19.Fridfeldt refers to II Corinthians 3 noting the distinction between "the letter and the Spirit" in v.6 (210-211). How does this distinction demonstrate the relationship of Law and Gospel?



20.How does Fridfeldt come to see infant Baptism as a gift of the Gospel (214-221)?



21. How do the words of the Rector help Fridfeldt to appreciate the freedom we have in the Gospel (226-227)? See Galatians 5:1-4.






PART III: "On This Rock" (231-335)

1. What was Pastor Trovik's picture of the spiritual condition of his new parish (233)?



2. What had happened to the old rector? How had he left the parish (237)?



3.Why was Pastor Torvik not trusted by his people (238)?



3. Why does Pastor Torvik think that his ministry is a failure (239-241)?



4. Pastor Torvik is called upon to take the Lord's Supper to an elderly home-bound woman known as Mother Hanna. What did Pastor Torvik discover as he visited with this rather talkative woman (247-250)?



5. How did Pastor Torvik's visit with this woman end (251)?



6. After the disappointing episode with Mother Hanna, what did Pastor Torvik resolve to do (253)?


7. What did Torvik see in his dream? What effect did this nightmare have on him (261ff)?



8.What was Trovik's real problem? How had he judged the validity of the Christian faith (268)?



8. Schenstedt had been one of Pastor Torvik's adversaries in the parish. How do things begin to change with him (270-279)?



9. "I think you can blame yourself, Pastor. If one whips the flock of God with the scourge of the law instead of guiding it to the springs of living water, everything will eventually go wrong. No one can endure unlimited lashings" (280). How had Torvik relied on the law instead of the Gospel to accomplish results?



10. What does the woman mean when she tells Torvik that "it won't do to offer Moses a forty percent agreement and expect him to be satisfied with our becoming absolutely pure and loving and honest, as you are always talking about" (281-282)?



11.How did Mother Lotta point her pastor to the necessity of preaching the atonement (282-283)?




12.Mother Lotta pointed out to Pastor Torvik that he had denied Baptism. How had he done this (284-285)?



13. What did Mother Lotta teach the pastor about the cure of souls (285-287)?



14. How does Rector Bengtsson teach Torvik to read the Bible and understand the Office of the Holy Ministry (294-302)?



15. How does Bengtsson describe the twin dangers of pride and despair in the spiritual life (295)?



16. "Because you make your feelings your barometer, you pass by the gospel and are held fast by the law" (297). How does this happen?



17. Why did Torvik not want to wear his clericals (300)? Note the way in which Bengsston helps Torvik understand that as a pastor he is no longer "an ordinary person" but an office-bearer in Christ's church. Why is this understanding important (301)?



18.How does Schenstedt set aside the Bible by separating the Spirit from the Word (304-306)?


19. How does Schenstedt interpret the Bible (306-307)?



20. What questions does Torvik ask Schenstedt regarding the conscience (307)?



21. "The important thing was not what one believes but what one does" (310). What does this attitude indicate?


22. How does Bengsston describe the fight against sin (314-316)?



23. How does Bengsston preach the atonement (317-320)?


24. How does Bengsston describe the relationship of the atonement to the Means of Grace (320)?


25. What was the significance of Jude 3 for Torvik (321-322)? How does Torvik now come to preach the true Gospel (323)? What was Schenstedt's reaction (323-329)?


26.Where does Torvik find true renewal and revival (331-335)? See Acts 2:42.